Home  /  BIM and ARCHICAD   /  New User Trouble

New User Trouble

Mr. New User, Don’t forget that you still need to produce printed documents

I find many new users get obsessed with modeling and don’t want to hear about the 2D world. This is both great and a disaster. I love to see people excited about modeling, about leaving the world of flatcad for good. But… We need to produce legible prints in a timely manner.  If you ignore dimensions, notes, sheeting drawings, etc. it’s very easy to fall into The Ugly Trap.

What’s The Ugly Trap? It’s when you spend a week working on a new project, but at the end you have an ugly unresolved model and horrendous (or non-existent) drawings that someone who doesn’t understand BIM won’t see the value of. They’ll ask questions like “What have you been doing all week?” or “I hate computers” or “if we were doing this in AutoCAD or by hand…” Your work is clouded by ugliness. And it’s easy to get disheartened and disgruntled. You’ll want to scream “It’s early! There’s so much information in there. It’s coordinated! Look past the materials. Look past those lines, they’ll be resolved later, I swear! I promise!” Meanwhile the one guy still using a legacy program turns out a pile of trash that looks amazing. Too bad none of the sections match the elevations or plan. Early in SD no one cares (much). They should, but it’s easier to value 3 pretty drawings that don’t connect than 30 ugly ones that do. You might want to focus only on 3D modeling when learning ArchiCAD, but remember you still need to produce pretty drawings in a timely manner. Don’t get 80 hours into a project and then realize you can’t show anyone what you’ve done in traditional formats. Because face it, for the foreseeable future most of us will still be creating sheets and sheets of plans, sections, elevations, details and schedules.

Ms. New User, Remember that your layout book should progress at the same pace as your model

Here’s a rhetorical question: when should you make sure your sheets are laid out? Once your floor plans are blocked out. At that point you can lay out every section, elevation, interior elevation, and plan on a sheet. Don’t worry that your elevations have no roofs and your sections have no floors. That’s okay. And don’t worry that there might be some views to add later. You should know the scope of your project early on and be able to print progress sets whenever necessary. Do not wait until the end or until ‘it’s ready to sheet’. Think of the first pass of the layout book like the cartoon sets many of us once sketched out by hand on scrap pieces of paper. But better. And smarter. And much more useful. Every marker on every plan should be linked to a sheeted view before the first printing of that plan. This cartoon set will help you avoid The Ugly Trap because you’ll be very aware of how legible your work is at the end of every day.  And unlike the static cartoon set of yore, the ArchiCAD version continues to automatically update and evolves into your finished product.

When this roof plan was first sheeted it was kind of dull…

…but by the time I was finished detailing it, the layout was complete.

A Question for all of us

If you have 40 hrs to learn ArchiCAD, how much of that should be spent on modeling and how much on text, dimensions, sheet layout, masking (it happens, learn it), theory on how to work in ArchiCAD, etc. I don’t have an exact answer, but my gut tells me half the time should be dedicated to non-3D. How does that sound? Am I crazy?

 

note 1: If you’re lucky your office has a template that already has placed views on sheets so the task of creating a cartoon set should be that much easier. If your office template doesn’t have placed views in the layout book, update your template so that it does.

note 2: Clearly blocking out your layout book early in the project won’t completely save you from The Ugly Trap. There are many other techniques and tricks you should also be aware of (like fast, clean plans, smart use of default materials, hiding clutter, choosing your 3D battles, smart masking…), but those will have to wait for future blog posts.

Save

Comments

  • May 8, 2012
    reply

    Mats

    Very true facts written in a positive way. This is a must read for beginners and intermediates alike.

  • May 8, 2012
    reply

    Danj

    Those roof notes, arrow with fall arrow, are they a label of some sort or is that just 2d drafting.

  • May 8, 2012
    reply

    I resemble your remarks…

  • May 8, 2012
    reply

    After many deliveries with my Legacy program, I did my first AC15 delivery… with schedules, plans and details.

    I transferred a lot of drawing notes to worksheets for future use. Schedules, details, interior elevations, plan views were created but not linked. Interior elevations were redrawn in 2D for quality output…

    All in all, I’m happy with the results but need to start linking things together. It was a small 3.2K SF interior build-out, simple. Now I need to transition to 40K new construction.

    Love your posts!

  • May 9, 2012
    reply

    Sam Moodie

    Graphisoft should do more to promote the 2D capability ArchiCAD. It’s too common for a new user to produce 3D visuals with AC then revert to AutoCAD LT for the tender package.

    I know its a poor workflow to break the views down to 2D, but under time pressure, it should be promoted to new users as a work around whilst they develop the the extra though process required to get good-looking 2D straight from the model.

  • May 10, 2012
    reply

    This is an excellent article, Jared. I agree with you – this aspect of the process strategy is often neglected or ignored and can cause serious issues in an office.

  • May 11, 2012
    reply

    Jared,

    A very nice article. I have recently begun working in Archicad with the soul interest of producing well coordinated 2d drawings. Sounds backwards I know, but after my 25 years of designing I agree that what is important is the information needed to build a building. I love AC and wouldn’t trade it in for anything. Still learning the output stuff. Love to model and know how easy it is to get caught up in the precision of the model. I have realized and now you have confirmed it. Overlay is COOL! especially stairs. More importantly is the proper phasing of output for progress. I enjoy your articles. Now I have to learn more about the ins and outs of templating, Linking notes that I use and using schedules WELL.

  • May 14, 2012
    reply

    Nice article, this read like a letter to me as
    I find myself in the ugly trap more often than I’d like!
    Each drawing set I produce in Archicad I think I have got my head around the various issues we have here in the office only to find on the next one I haven’t!
    The main problem is getting the elevations/sections to read as we want without overlining them (which I just don’t like doping). I wish elements in archicad had options to choose linetype/weight for plan and elevation.
    What I think would help new/intermediate users like myself is getting a full BIM documentation file but I find these are hard to get your hands on which is fair enough.

  • May 15, 2012
    reply

    Daniel I’m on the same page. Having the same struggles with different views. Elevations, Setions Etc. Details.

  • May 17, 2012
    reply

    Daniel

    That would be fantastic Jared.
    I guess the frustration lies in the fact that I’m trying to find the model based solution without luck!
    The office has no template so or examples to work from so I’m in the dark somewhat.
    Cheers

  • May 20, 2012
    reply

    Daniel

    We have recently purchased the Eric Bobrow’s mastertamplate so am in the process of modifying it to suit.
    Look forward to the sample file/post!

  • October 20, 2012
    reply

    I’ve used AC since version 4.5, and is still struggling with this problem of when to unlink 3D for good 2D sheets.
    I’d appreciate if you could detail how to mask
    3D with 2D.

Post a Comment